Quote Originally Posted by RonSSS View Post
Good info, thanks. The light fram is essentially better everywhere.

Ron
If "better" is interchangeable with "more efficient" then yes. To me everywhere would include high volume tests, where the light fram will likely distort first. I does seem to have slightly better 9-12kHz response. I would also expect better transients, as a lighter mass accelerates quicker.

I suspect in an A/B on delicate tracks, like acoustic stuff, the light fram would be readily identifiable.